How We Evaluate Astrology Services
The evidence we look for, the limits of our assessments, and how readers can check claims.
What an evaluation should establish
Our evaluation framework focuses on observable service qualities: a clear description, transparent prices, useful booking information, accessible support, and understandable privacy and cancellation terms. Those features help readers compare a purchase. They do not demonstrate that astrology can predict future events. We keep service quality and claims of predictive ability as separate questions.
Label the source of each finding
A published policy, a checkout observation, a reader's report, and a personally attended consultation are different kinds of evidence. A service page should identify which evidence supports its conclusions and when it was checked. This methodology page does not claim that every provider has been personally tested. Where a booking or policy check has not been completed, it should be described as unverified.
Avoid invented precision
A numerical rating needs a stated scale and evidence for each criterion. We do not treat a star score as proof of a reader's abilities or combine unrelated claims into an unexplained verdict. Offers can change, so readers should confirm the final price and terms with the provider before paying. A detailed limitation is more useful than an unsupported superlative.
Keep commercial information visible
Any paid placement or referral relationship should be disclosed close to the relevant link. Compensation must not be described as independent proof of quality. A correction should identify the specific fact that changed, rather than silently refreshing every date. Readers comparing services can use this framework themselves: save the offer, check the terms, and judge what the service actually delivers.